Pearly Gates is...Quick ReferenceRecent postsLinksRichard's other blog:Hall Of Fame:
The "Real" Media:
Halosphere:
Minor League Affiliates:
Other Baseball Blogs:
Other Random Crap (in a good way):
Soccer:Archive
Blog*Spot ArchivesContactRichard Ceccarelli Josh Mandir |
Tuesday, December 21, 2004I hate itA lot of folks are asking how this happened. Well, I think it's pretty clear - Bill Stoneman fell in love with Cabrera when he was in the Expos front office, and he's had a hard-on for the guy ever since. This wasn't the first time the Angels had been linked to Cabrera. So when Stoneman found himself with a little extra spendin' cash (after not signing Beltran, not signing Clement, and not signing Kline), he turned to a familiar object of lust. Rob and Chronicles have already done it, so let me give you a few of the many reasons why this deal is almost enough to drive me to Harry Caray:
BTW: "Nomar Garciaparra" comes out as "Mammary Grasshopper" in the blogger spell check. He-he! UPDATE: After a conversation about GPA with Joe (in the comments below), I decided to figure out the park-adjusted GPA of Eckstein and Cabrera. I did it like OPS+, so 100 is league average. Player GPA+ D Eckstein 89 O. Cabrera 90 V. Guererro 125 G. Anderson 103 T. Glaus 116 J. DaVanon 107Low and behold, the numbers show Cabrera is just slightly better than Eckstein, but both pretty much suck. I like this - I'm going to do this more often. Maybe I'll go back and look at the Finley/Beltran/DaVanon/Figgins thing later. Comments:Cabrera's glove is overrated...? sure he had 1 bad game against the Nationals, but outside of that he's made 2 errors all year, 40% of the way through the season. the only infielder with fewer errors or better fielding % is Erstad, big surprise there. no kidding he doesn't put up numbers, but as you pointed out neither does Eckstein, who was a cute kid but couldn't even throw across the infield. but at least Cabrera will get a few knocks this season -- maybe even squeak into double digits. go Halos! :-) bri posted by @ 11:29 PM
|