An Angels blog
Pearly Gates: An Angels Blog
Pearly Gates: An Angels Blog

Navigate

Pearly Gates is...

Quick Reference

BP Player Cards:

ESPN Player Cards:

Baseball Cube:

Baseball Reference:

Recent posts

Links

Archive

Contact

Sunday, December 12, 2004

Rumblings from the Marriott

Angels close on Clement
From several sources, including the Times and Register:
A day after finding their center fielder, the team made an offer to a starting pitcher, Matt Clement, and felt it had a good chance of landing him. They might even get him signed by the time these meetings wrap up Monday.

The Angels offered Clement what's believed to be a three-year deal in the neighborhood of $27 million, which should make them the front-runner to land the ex-Chicago Cubs right-hander.
The Times has the offer at $21 over 3, which I would consider a steal after the ridiculous contracts handed to Benson, Wright, Pavano, and Lieber. Clement is easily the best of the starters still on the market, so even $9 million per wouldn't be too bad.

Perhaps the best part of this move is that it has the added effect of taking the Angels out the Pedro Martinez talks for good, a day after Jayson Stark reported that they could still be in it.
Shortstop not on Stoneman's shopping list
In today's Times, Bill Stoneman reveals that he's not looking to add a shortstop this offseason:
But the GM said he is not pursuing a shortstop, a position incumbent David Eckstein and newly acquired Maicer Izturis will compete for in the spring.

"That's not really where our focus is now," Stoneman said. "That doesn't mean we won't stumble into something, though."
Smart decision. With Nomar and Renteria off the market, there's really no one that could be considered a substantial upgrade over what the Angels already have. As I said after Izturis was acquired in the Guillen deal, "Izturis is basically a David Eckstein clone (Eckstein from the 2001/2002 seasons) with a better glove. In open competition with Eckstein, I'm confident Izturis would win the job." And I'm all for that.

Comments: